Compaq ProLiant 1600 Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 on the Compaq ProLiant 1600 - Page 4
Performance Results - pentium ii
View all Compaq ProLiant 1600 manuals
Add to My Manuals
Save this manual to your list of manuals |
Page 4 highlights
Performance Results The benchmark was conducted using Microsoft's Load Simulator tool. For each test, the Load Simulator Medium MAPI canonical profile was chosen. The Medium MAPI profile reflects the task workload of a typical corporate e-mail user, including common daily mail tasks such as send, browse, read, and forward, as well as calendaring tasks and distribution list usage. The Response Time score represents a 95th-percentile score of the measured test run. The score is expressed in milliseconds (ms). The ProLiant 1600 Response Time score of 230 ms is well below the 1000 ms acceptable threshold for e-mail users utilizing Exchange Server's MAPI protocol. Microsoft has certified these benchmark results based on the Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 UPS (Users Per Server) Policy Guidelines V1.0. Table 1. Performance Highlights (ProLiant 1600, 6/400, 2 CPU, 1024 MB RAM) User Load Response Time (milliseconds) Messages Submitted (8-hour period) Messages Delivered (8-hour period) Messages Recipients Delivered (8-hour period) Messages Sent (8-hour period) 8,000 230 115,712 147,090 644,042 31,374 Note: Test results based on Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 UPS Policy Guidelines V1.0. The test result disclosure can be found in Appendix A Table 2. Compaq ProLiant 1600 Tested configuration (2) Intel Pentium II 400-MHz - 512K Level-2 writeback cache per processor 1024 MB ECC SDRAM DIMMs (2) SMART-2/DH Array Controller OS/Pagefile/Exchange DS/MTA Files: (2) 4.3-GB Drives - RAID1 Exchange Log Files: (2) 4.3-GB Drives - RAID1 Exchange Information Store Files: (12) 4.3-GB Drives - RAID0 Compaq Netelligent 10/100 TX Embedded UTP NIC Microsoft Windows Enterprise Server NT 4.0 with Service Pack 3 Exchange Server v5.5 -Enterprise Edition (Tuning: Perfwiz defaults) Note: The test results disclosure can be found in Appendix A. What the Benchmarks Don't Tell You It is important to understand that benchmarks such as these are designed to give Exchange Server implementation planners baseline references for understanding the capabilities of hardware platforms from a single vendor such as Compaq or other competing hardware vendors. When interpreting these benchmarks, however, two things should be kept in mind. ECG1090898