HP LH4r HP Netserver & Microsoft Terminal Server 4.0 - Page 25

HP LH4r - NetServer - 256 MB RAM Manual

Page 25 highlights

Network Segment - % Network Utilization The following chart shows average values for the % Network Utilization counter recorded when running 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 client sessions for each of the tested server configurations. Network Segment - Average % Network Utilization 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 12 24 36 48 60 72 LX Pro 0.15 1.57 3.05 4.5 5.66 6.91 8.09 LPr 0.12 1.51 3.02 4.53 5.64 7.49 9.54 LH 3 0.12 1.62 3.18 4.51 5.92 7.42 9.47 LXr 8000 0.13 1.54 3.01 4.42 6 6.87 7.89 Number of Client Sessions Figure 20 The following chart shows maximum values for the % Network Utilization counter recorded when running 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 client sessions for each of the tested server configurations. 25 20 15 10 5 0 LX Pro LPr LH 3 LXr 8000 Network Segment - Maximum % Network Utilization 1 12 24 36 48 60 72 0.8 4.37 8.99 11.47 11.25 11.23 13.31 0.85 5.76 9.47 11.83 11.55 14.7 15.54 0.86 5.98 9.56 13.17 15.17 16.3 18.27 0.52 5.65 9.18 13.11 13.33 19.44 19.59 N umber of C lient Sessions Figure 21 NOTE With a 10 Mbit network, our test results show that, for our script, network activity was not a bottleneck. Upgrading to a 100 Mbit network would not have significantly improved our test results. However, it is important to remember that, for purposes of our test, we used an isolated network with no additional traffic. In additional, our test script was not graphics intensive. As expected, as processor utilization increases network activity begins to level off. Hewlett-Packard Company 25

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30

Hewlett-Packard Company
25
Network Segment - % Network Utilization
The following chart shows average values for the
% Network Utilization
counter
recorded when running 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 client sessions for each of
the tested server configurations.
Network Segment - Average % Network Utilization
0
5
10
15
20
25
Number of Client Sessions
LX Pro
0.15
1.57
3.05
4.5
5.66
6.91
8.09
LPr
0.12
1.51
3.02
4.53
5.64
7.49
9.54
LH3
0.12
1.62
3.18
4.51
5.92
7.42
9.47
LXr 8000
0.13
1.54
3.01
4.42
6
6.87
7.89
1
12
24
36
48
60
72
Figure 20
The following chart shows maximum values for the
% Network Utilization
counter recorded when running 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 client sessions for
each of the tested server configurations.
Network Segment - Maximum % Network Utilization
0
5
10
15
20
25
Number of Client Sessions
LX Pro
0.8
4.37
8.99
11.47
11.25
11.23
13.31
LPr
0.85
5.76
9.47
11.83
11.55
14.7
15.54
LH 3
0.86
5.98
9.56
13.17
15.17
16.3
18.27
LXr 8000
0.52
5.65
9.18
13.11
13.33
19.44
19.59
1
12
24
36
48
60
72
Figure 21
NOTE
With a 10 Mbit network, our test results show that, for our script,
network activity was not a bottleneck. Upgrading to a 100 Mbit
network would not have significantly improved our test results.
However, it is important to remember that, for purposes of our test, we
used an isolated network with no additional traffic. In additional, our
test script was not graphics intensive.
As expected, as processor utilization increases network activity begins
to level off.