Lantronix Spider KVM Over IP Switch Spider App. Note - Page 3

Introduction, Key Concepts

Page 3 highlights

The Spider Network: A Guide to Maximizing Distributed KVM Installations Introduction As the Lantronix SecureLinx™ Spider, a KVM (keyboard, video, mouse)-over-IP solution, gains popularity in the distributed IT environment, several questions have arisen with regard to its implementation, limitations, and performance. As an ideal solution for the distributed IT/ remote branch office environments, Spider offers networking concepts and protocols that allow for seamless integration into any network. This application note provides the information needed (protocol settings, bandwidth and performance, scalability, etc.) to ensure your Spider is working at an optimal level in your network. Key Concepts The Spider Difference Unlike traditional KVM switches, Spider offers a flexible, scalable, and affordable CAT5-based remote access KVM solution in a cable-friendly, compact "zero-footprint" package. Unlike traditional KVM solutions, Spider provides continuous availability to servers with 1:1 non-blocked, BIOS-level access. This allows administrators to have guaranteed access to mission-critical servers regardless of how many of them need remote access. In other words, administrators are not "locked in" to a fixed number of remote users. Spider offers an extremely low-cost-per-remote-user for guaranteed non-blocked access. No client software or an external power supply is required. The Spider boots in approximately one minute upon plugging into a server or auxiliary power supply, and no additional hardware initialization or selection time is necessary upon initiating a user session. The small device is light enough to be suspended by its connection cables behind the target or conveniently stowed within the server's rack. Up to eight client sessions with any single target are possible, though only one client will have the ability to control the target at any time. Protocols Typical A/V (audio/visual) streaming protocols such as Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) use User Datagram Protocol (UDP) allow packet broadcast and multicasting with minimal messaging in applications that can withstand dropped, duplicated, or erroneous packets. Spider uses the Remote Framebuffer (RFB) over TCP instead, ensuring that the transmitted packets are reliable and ordered through ACK messages sent from the client back to the Spider. RFB is designed to update all, or a portion of a screen snapshot efficiently using relatively simple compression rather than a timer that triggers the transmission of data over the network. Working at the framebuffer level, the RFB protocol allows interoperability among the vast majority of clients and servers. In the absence of application-specific software, the client and server simply agree on the protocol version and then can begin transmitting The Spider-Based Network: A Guide to Maximizing Distributed KVM Installations 3 The information contained in this document is protected by copyright. Information is subject to change without notice. Lantronix, Inc. makes no claim regarding the accuracy of this competitive information and specifically disclaims any and all liability for loss or damages of any kind resulting from decisions made or actions taken by any party based on this information.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

The Spider Network: A Guide to Maximizing Distributed KVM Installations
The Spider-Based Network: A Guide to Maximizing Distributed KVM Installations
3
The information contained in this document is protected by copyright. Information is subject to change without notice.
Lantronix, Inc. makes no claim regarding the accuracy of this competitive information and specifically disclaims any and all
liability for loss or damages of any kind resulting from decisions made or actions taken by any party based on this
information.
Introduction
As the Lantronix
SecureLinx™
Spider, a KVM (keyboard, video, mouse)-over-IP
solution, gains popularity in the distributed IT environment, several questions have arisen
with regard to its implementation, limitations, and performance. As an ideal solution for
the distributed IT/ remote branch office environments, Spider offers networking concepts
and protocols that allow for seamless integration into any network.
This application note provides the information needed (protocol settings, bandwidth and
performance, scalability, etc.) to ensure your Spider is working at an optimal level in
your network.
Key Concepts
The Spider Difference
Unlike traditional KVM switches, Spider offers a flexible, scalable, and affordable
CAT5-based remote access KVM solution in a cable-friendly,
compact “zero
-
footprint”
package.
Unlike traditional KVM solutions, Spider provides continuous availability to servers with
1:1 non-blocked, BIOS-level access. This allows administrators to have guaranteed
access to mission-critical servers regardless of how many of them need remote access. In
other words, administrators are not “locked in” to
a fixed number of remote users. Spider
offers an extremely low-cost-per-remote-user for guaranteed non-blocked access. No
client software or an external power supply is required.
The Spider boots in approximately one minute upon plugging into a server or auxiliary
power supply, and no additional hardware initialization or selection time is necessary
upon initiating a user session.
The small device is light enough to be suspended by its connection cables behind the
target or conveniently st
owed within the server’s rack. U
p to eight client sessions with
any single target are possible, though only one client will have the ability to control the
target at any time.
Protocols
Typical A/V (audio/visual) streaming protocols such as Real Time Streaming Protocol
(RTSP) use User Datagram Protocol (UDP) allow packet broadcast and multicasting with
minimal messaging in applications that can withstand dropped, duplicated, or erroneous
packets. Spider uses the Remote Framebuffer (RFB) over TCP instead, ensuring that the
transmitted packets are reliable and ordered through ACK messages sent from the client
back to the Spider. RFB is designed to update all, or a portion of a screen snapshot
efficiently using relatively simple compression rather than a timer that triggers the
transmission of data over the network.
Working at the framebuffer level, the RFB protocol allows interoperability among the
vast majority of clients and servers. In the absence of application-specific software, the
client and server simply agree on the protocol version and then can begin transmitting