EMC CX500I Configuration Guide - Page 46

Data Availability and Disk Space Usage, Group: RAID 5, RAID 3, RAID 1 mirrored pair

Page 46 highlights

RAID Types and Trade-offs Data Availability and Disk Space Usage If data availability is critical and you cannot afford to wait hours to replace a disk, rebind it, make it accessible to the operating system, and load its information from backup, then use a redundant RAID Group: RAID 5, RAID 3, RAID 1 mirrored pair, or RAID 1/0. If data availability is not critical, or disk space usage is critical, bind an individual unit. A RAID 1 mirrored pair or RAID 1/0 Group provides very high data availability. They are more expensive than RAID 5 or RAID 3 Groups, since only 50 percent of the total disk capacity is available for user data, as shown in Figure 2-7 on page 2-17. A RAID 5 or RAID 3 Group provides high data availability, but requires more disks than a mirrored pair. In a RAID 5 or RAID 3 Group, the disk space available for user data is the total capacity of one less than the number of disks in the RAID Group. For example, in a five-disk RAID 5 Group, the capacity of four disks is available for user data, which is 80% of the group's total disk capacity. So RAID 5 and RAID 3 Groups use disk space much more efficiently than a mirrored pair. A RAID 5 or RAID 3 Group is usually more suitable than a RAID 1 mirrored pair for applications where high data availability, good performance, and efficient disk space usage are all of relatively equal importance. For a LUN in any RAID Group, you can provide for disaster recovery by establishing a remote mirror at a distant site. Figure 2-7 illustrates RAID type disk space usage. 2-16 EMC CLARiiON CX300, CX500, CX500i, and CX700 Storage Systems Configuration Planning Guide

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142

2-16
EMC CLARiiON CX300, CX500, CX500i, and CX700 Storage Systems Configuration Planning Guide
RAID Types and Trade-offs
Data Availability and Disk Space Usage
If data availability is critical and you cannot afford to wait hours to
replace a disk, rebind it, make it accessible to the operating system,
and load its information from backup, then use a redundant RAID
Group: RAID 5, RAID 3, RAID 1 mirrored pair, or RAID 1/0. If data
availability is not critical, or disk space usage is critical, bind an
individual unit.
A RAID 1 mirrored pair or RAID 1/0 Group provides very high data
availability. They are more expensive than RAID 5 or RAID 3 Groups,
since only 50 percent of the total disk capacity is available for user
data, as shown in Figure 2-7 on page 2-17.
A RAID 5 or RAID 3 Group provides high data availability, but
requires more disks than a mirrored pair. In a RAID 5 or RAID 3
Group, the disk space available for user data is the total capacity of
one less than the number of disks in the RAID Group. For example, in
a five-disk RAID 5 Group, the capacity of four disks is available for
user data, which is 80% of the group’s total disk capacity. So RAID 5
and RAID 3 Groups use disk space much more efficiently than a
mirrored pair. A RAID 5 or RAID 3 Group is usually more suitable
than a RAID 1 mirrored pair for applications where high data
availability, good performance, and efficient disk space usage are all
of relatively equal importance.
For a LUN in any RAID Group, you can provide for disaster recovery
by establishing a remote mirror at a distant site.
Figure 2-7 illustrates RAID type disk space usage.