Acer Veriton M661 Intel Matrix Storage and RAID - Page 8

Raid1, Raid5, Raid10

Page 8 highlights

Intel Matrix Storage Manager Quick Guide for Acer Selected Veriton PC V1.1 multiple controllers with RAID1 only one drive per controller ¾ Very simple design ¾ Easy to implement ¾ Twice the Read transaction ¾ rate of single disks, same Write transaction rate as single disks ¾ ¾ 100 percent redundancy of data means no rebuild is necessary in case of a disk failure, just a copy to the replacement disk ¾ Transfer rate per block is equal to that of a single disk ¾ Under certain circumstances, RAID1 can sustain multiple simultaneous drive failures ¾ Simplest RAID storage subsystem design RAID5 ¾ Highest Read data transaction ¾ rate ¾ Medium Write data transaction ¾ rate ¾ Low ratio of ECC (parity) disks to data disks means high ¾ RAID10 efficiency ¾ Good aggregate transfer rate ¾ Very high I/O rates are ¾ achieved by striping RAID1 segments ¾ ¾ Excellent solution for sites that would normally use RAID1 Highest disk overhead of all RAID types (100%) - inefficient May not support hot-swap of failed disk when implemented using software RAID Most complex controller design Difficult to rebuild in the event of a disk failure (as compared to RAID 1) Individual block data transfer rate same as single disk Very limited scalability at a very high inherent cost Expensive to maintain 8/21

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21

Intel Matrix Storage Manager Quick Guide for Acer Selected Veriton PC V1.1
8/21
multiple controllers with
only one drive per controller
Very simple design
Easy to implement
RAID1
Twice the Read transaction
rate of single disks, same
Write transaction rate as
single disks
100 percent redundancy of data
means no rebuild is necessary
in case of a disk failure, just
a copy to the replacement disk
Transfer rate per block is
equal to that of a single disk
Under certain circumstances,
RAID1 can sustain multiple
simultaneous drive failures
Simplest RAID storage
subsystem design
Highest disk overhead of all
RAID types (100%) —
inefficient
May not support hot-swap of
failed disk when implemented
using software RAID
RAID5
Highest Read data transaction
rate
Medium Write data transaction
rate
Low ratio of ECC (parity)
disks to data disks means high
efficiency
Good aggregate transfer rate
Most complex controller
design
Difficult to rebuild in the
event of a disk failure (as
compared to RAID 1)
Individual block data
transfer rate same as single
disk
RAID10
Very high I/O rates are
achieved by striping RAID1
segments
Excellent solution for sites
that would normally use RAID1
Very limited scalability at a
very high inherent cost
Expensive to maintain