Compaq 307560-001 Disk Subsystem Performance and Scalability - Page 24

Summary of Findings - Like Capacity Scaling, Disk Controller Scaling

Page 24 highlights

ECG025.0997 WHITE PAPER (cont.) ... Summary of Findings - Like Capacity Scaling Our test results conclude that by doubling the number of drives in a system, regardless of the data storage capacity requirements and the fault tolerance used, we consistently received an improvement in performance. However, the performance increase lessened as we added more and more drives to our system. We should also consider the limitations of each configuration. For example, by using lower capacity drives on one controller you improve performance, however, you sacrifice using the maximum disk capacity on that controller. To decide which test configuration best fits your needs, we recommend that you first review your system requirements, weigh the advantages and disadvantages of like capacity scaling, then purchase the correct drive capacity along with the correct number spindles for your environment. Refer to the "Performance Measurement Tools" section within this document for information on tools that can assist you in measuring system performance. DISK CONTROLLER SCALABILITY When analyzing controller scalability, the focus is on the performance difference between a single controller using a specified number of spindles versus multiple controllers using equally divided drives. Does one controller with all drives attached to it out perform two controllers with the drives divided equally among the controllers? For example, let's say you configure fourteen disk drives in one controller, then split the fourteen drives (seven on each controller) and configure them in a two-controller environment. Which one out performs the other? Disk controller scaling will answer this question for us. Disk Controller Scaling The key to disk controller scaling is to find the point at which your hardware does not produce a significant benefit in system performance. We define this point by testing the scalability of a controller. To scale a controller, we used a constant number of drives with equal disk capacity and tested a single controller versus multiple controllers. For example, the testing results determine if two SMART-2 Controllers with a fewer number of drives on each controller provide better performance than one SMART-2 Controller configured with all the drives. 24

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30

W
HITE
P
APER
(cont.)
24
ECG025.0997
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Summary of Findings – Like Capacity Scaling
Our test results conclude that by doubling the number of drives in a system, regardless of
the data storage capacity requirements and the fault tolerance used, we consistently
received an improvement in performance.
However, the performance increase lessened
as we added more and more drives to our system.
We should also consider the
limitations of each configuration.
For example, by using lower capacity drives on one
controller you improve performance, however, you sacrifice using the maximum disk
capacity on that controller.
To decide which test configuration best fits your needs, we recommend that you first
review your system requirements, weigh the advantages and disadvantages of like
capacity scaling, then purchase the correct drive capacity along with the correct
number spindles for your environment.
Refer to the “Performance Measurement Tools"
section within this document for information on tools that can assist you in measuring
system performance.
D
ISK
C
ONTROLLER
S
CALABILITY
When analyzing controller scalability, the focus is on the performance difference between
a single controller using a specified number of spindles versus multiple controllers using
equally divided drives.
Does one controller with all drives attached to it out perform two
controllers with the drives divided equally among the controllers?
For example, let’s say
you configure fourteen disk drives in one controller, then split the fourteen drives (seven
on each controller) and configure them in a two-controller environment.
Which one out
performs the other?
Disk controller scaling will answer this question for us.
Disk Controller Scaling
The key to disk controller scaling is to find the point at which your hardware does not
produce a significant benefit in system performance.
We define this point by testing the
scalability of a controller.
To scale a controller, we used a constant number of drives with
equal disk capacity and tested a single controller versus multiple controllers.
For
example, the testing results determine if two SMART-2 Controllers with a fewer number of
drives on each controller provide better performance than one SMART-2 Controller
configured with all the drives.