Intel SL8K2 Specification Update - Page 60

Compatibility Mode STOS Instructions May Alter RSI Register Results on

Page 60 highlights

Errata R R87. FXSAVE Instruction May Result in Incorrect Data on Processors Supporting Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T) Problem: In IA-32e mode of the Intel EM64T processor, the upper 32 bits of the FDP value written out to memory by the FXSAVE instruction may be incorrect. Implication: This erratum may cause incorrect data to be saved into the memory. Workaround: It is possible for the BIOS to contain a workaround for this erratum. Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes. R88. Compatibility Mode STOS Instructions May Alter RSI Register Results on a Processor Supporting Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T) Problem: When a processor supporting Intel EM64T is in IA-32e mode and executes a STOS instruction in compatibility mode, it may modify the RSI register contents. Implication: When this erratum occurs, systems may encounter unexpected behavior. Workaround: It is possible for the BIOS to contain a workaround for this erratum. Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes. R89. LDT Descriptor Which Crosses 16 bit Boundary Access Does Not Cause a #GP Fault on a Processor Supporting Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T) Problem: When a processor supporting Intel EM64T in IA-32e mode accesses an LDT entry (16-byte) that crosses the 0xffff limit, a #GP fault is not signaled and instead the upper 8-bytes of the entry is fetched from the wrapped around address (usually 0x0). This will cause the erroneous data to be loaded into the upper 8-bytes of the descriptor. Implication: When this erratum occurs, systems may encounter unexpected behavior. Intel has not observed this erratum with any commercially available software. Workaround: Software should prevent LDT selector accesses from crossing the 0xffff limit. Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes. R90. Upper Reserved Bits are Incorrectly Checked While Loading PDPTR's on a Processor Supporting Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel® EM64T) Problem: In IA32 & IA-32e mode of the Intel® processor, upper reserved bits are incorrectly checked while loading PDPTR's, allowing software to set the reserved bits. Implication: Operating system software is able to set the reserved bits which may result in an unexpected system behavior. Workaround: None identified. Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes. 60 Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor on 90 nm Process Specification Update

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75

Errata
R
60
Intel
®
Pentium
®
4 Processor on 90 nm Process Specification Update
R87.
FXSAVE Instruction May Result in Incorrect Data on Processors
Supporting Intel
®
Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel
®
EM64T)
Problem:
In IA-32e mode of the Intel EM64T processor, the upper 32 bits of the FDP value written out to
memory by the FXSAVE instruction may be incorrect.
Implication:
This erratum may cause incorrect data to be saved into the memory.
Workaround:
It is possible for the BIOS to contain a workaround for this erratum.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the
Summary Tables of Changes
.
R88.
Compatibility Mode STOS Instructions May Alter RSI Register Results on a
Processor Supporting Intel
®
Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel
®
EM64T)
Problem:
When a processor supporting Intel EM64T is in IA-32e mode and executes a STOS instruction in
compatibility mode, it may modify the RSI register contents.
Implication:
When this erratum occurs, systems may encounter unexpected behavior.
Workaround:
It is possible for the BIOS to contain a workaround for this erratum.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the
Summary Tables of Changes
.
R89.
LDT Descriptor Which Crosses 16 bit Boundary Access Does Not Cause a
#GP Fault on a Processor Supporting Intel
®
Extended Memory 64
Technology (Intel
®
EM64T)
Problem:
When a processor supporting Intel EM64T in IA-32e mode accesses an LDT entry (16-byte) that
crosses the 0xffff limit, a #GP fault is not signaled and instead the upper 8-bytes of the entry is
fetched from the wrapped around address (usually 0x0). This will cause the erroneous data to be
loaded into the upper 8-bytes of the descriptor.
Implication:
When this erratum occurs, systems may encounter unexpected behavior.
Intel has not observed
this erratum with any commercially available software.
Workaround:
Software should prevent LDT selector accesses from crossing the 0xffff limit.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the
Summary Tables of Changes
.
R90.
Upper Reserved Bits are Incorrectly Checked While Loading PDPTR's on a
Processor Supporting Intel
®
Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel
®
EM64T)
Problem:
In IA32 & IA-32e mode of the Intel
®
processor, upper reserved bits are incorrectly checked while
loading PDPTR's, allowing software to set the reserved bits.
Implication:
Operating system software is able to set the reserved bits which may result in an unexpected
system behavior.
Workaround:
None identified.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the
Summary Tables of Changes
.