Compaq ProLiant 1000 I/O Performance Tuning of Compaq Servers - Page 25

Distance vs. Performance

Page 25 highlights

I/O Performance Tuning of Compaq Servers 25 Simulated Application: Maximum MB/sec (1 MB, 100% Read, 0% Write, 100% Sequential, 0% Random) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 RAID 0 RAID 1 RAID 5 RAID 5 No Cache RAID Level Fibre Channel Array SMART-2DH Figure 10. Relative maximum throughput for SCSI and Fibre Channel storage systems. These results were obtained using Iometer version 1998.10.08, Copyright 1998 by Intel Corporation. Intel does not endorse any Iometer results. Distance vs. Performance The following graphs illustrate the impact of latency over long distances. The throughput of the 2 x 10km cable system quickly becomes limited by the latency introduced by the extended loop. In situations where remote storage is required, the performance implications should be taken into consideration. Simulated Workload: WS Mix (4 KB, 50% Read, 50% Write, 50% Sequential, 50% Random) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of Fibre Channel Arrays 5 Meter Cable 10 Kilometer Cable 2 x 10 Kilometer Cables Figure 11. Relative performance of FC-AL systems for common workstation loads. These results were obtained using Iometer version 1998.10.08, Copyright 1998 by Intel Corporation. Intel does not endorse any Iometer results. ECG044.0399

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38

I/O Performance Tuning of Compaq Servers
25
ECG044.0399
Simulated Application:
Maximum MB/sec
(1 MB, 100% Read, 0% Write, 100% Sequential, 0% Random)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
RAID 0
RAID 1
RAID 5
RAID 5 No Cache
RAID Level
Fibre Channel Array
SMART-2DH
Figure 10.
Relative maximum throughput for SCSI and Fibre Channel storage systems. These
results were obtained using Iometer version 1998.10.08, Copyright 1998
by Intel Corporation. Intel
does not endorse any Iometer results.
Distance vs. Performance
The following graphs illustrate the impact of latency over long distances. The throughput of the 2
x 10km cable system quickly becomes limited by the latency introduced by the extended loop. In
situations where remote storage is required, the performance implications should be taken into
consideration.
Simulated Workload:
WS Mix
(4 KB, 50% Read, 50% Write, 50% Sequential, 50% Random)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1
2
3
4
5
6
Number of Fibre Channel Arrays
5 Meter Cable
10 Kilometer Cable
2 x 10 Kilometer Cables
Figure 11.
Relative performance of FC-AL systems for common workstation loads. These results
were obtained using Iometer version 1998.10.08, Copyright 1998
by Intel Corporation. Intel does not
endorse any Iometer results.