Compaq ProLiant 1000 I/O Performance Tuning of Compaq Servers - Page 34

Drive Controller Scaling

Page 34 highlights

I/O Performance Tuning of Compaq Servers 34 Drive Controller Scaling Figures 27 and 28 illustrate the performance gains of distributing parity calculations by adding RAID array controllers. In Figure 29, the gains are negligible because the RAID 0 does not place a computational load on the array controller. Therefore, a single controller can handle the RAID 0 environment. Disk Controller Scaling (RAID 5) 20,000,000 18,000,000 10+2 x 4GB, 2 Ctr 11+1 x 4GB, 1 Ctr 16,000,000 Server Throughput (Bytes/sec) 14,000,000 57% 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 4 8 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 57 Number of Clients Figure 27. Drive controller scaling performance comparison in a RAID 5 environment. These results were obtained using NetBench version 5.01. Copyright 1997 by ZD Inc. All rights reserved. ZD did not independently verify this test and makes no representations or warranties as to the results of the test. Disk Controller Scaling (RAID 0) Server Throughput (Bytes/sec) 20,000,000 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 4 12 x 4GB, 1 Ctr 3% 12 x 4GB, 2 Ctr 8 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 57 Number of Clients Figure 28. Drive controller scaling performance comparison in a RAID 0 environment. These results were obtained using NetBench version 5.01. Copyright 1997 by ZD Inc. All rights reserved. ZD did not independently verify this test and makes no representations or warranties as to the results of the test. ECG044.0399

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38

I/O Performance Tuning of Compaq Servers
34
ECG044.0399
Drive Controller Scaling
Figures 27 and 28 illustrate the performance gains of distributing parity calculations by adding
RAID array controllers. In Figure 29, the gains are negligible because the RAID 0 does not place
a computational load on the array controller. Therefore, a single controller can handle the RAID 0
environment.
Disk Controller Scaling (RAID 5)
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
4
8
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
57
Number of Clients
Server Throughput (Bytes/sec)
10+2 x 4GB, 2 Ctr
11+1 x 4GB, 1 Ctr
57%
Figure 27.
Drive controller scaling performance comparison in a RAID 5 environment. These results
were obtained using NetBench version 5.01.
Copyright 1997 by ZD Inc. All rights reserved. ZD did
not independently verify this test and makes no representations or warranties as to the results of the
test.
Disk Controller Scaling (RAID 0)
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
4
8
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
57
Number of Clients
Server Throughput (Bytes/sec)
12 x 4GB, 1 Ctr
12 x 4GB, 2 Ctr
3%
Figure 28.
Drive controller scaling performance comparison in a RAID 0 environment. These results
were obtained using NetBench version 5.01. Copyright 1997 by ZD Inc. All rights reserved. ZD did
not independently verify this test and makes no representations or warranties as to the results of the
test.