HP LC2000r HP NetRAID 1M/2M Installation & Configuration - Page 27

Table 2-1. RAID Level Summary for RAID Levels 0 to 5, RAID Level, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5

Page 27 highlights

Chapter 2 RAID Overview ♦ With the HP NetRAID-2M adapter, you can span up to eight RAID 5 arrays, although the total number of disks in the RAID 50 logical drive is limited by the number of disks that can be attached to the two SCSI channels. For example, if two Rack Storage/12 enclosures are used, the maximum number of disks in a RAID 50 logical drive is 24. RAID 50 gives good performance if you have a high volume of small, random transfers. RAID 50 Disadvantages • Capacity expansion is an offline operation only. • Performance is slower than RAID 0 or RAID 10. RAID 50 Summary • Choose RAID 50 if you need a large logical drive size, and cost, availability, and performance are equally important. RAID 50 performs best for I/Ointensive, high read/write ratio applications such as transaction processing. Table 2-1. RAID Level Summary for RAID Levels 0 to 5 RAID Level Also Known As Fault Tolerance Redundancy Type Hot Spare Option Disks Required Usable Capacity Capacity Reduction Read Performance Random Write Performance Sequential Write Performance Typical Usage RAID 0 striping no none no one or more greatest none fast (depends on number of disks) fastest fastest Rapid reads and writes with no need for fault tolerance RAID 1 mirroring yes duplicate yes two least 50% intermediate intermediate intermediate Mostly small random writes with fault tolerance RAID 5 striping with distributed parity yes parity yes three or more intermediate capacity of one disk fast slow slowest Mostly small, random transfers with fault tolerance 19

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183

Chapter 2
RAID Overview
19
With the HP NetRAID-2M adapter, you can span up to eight RAID 5
arrays, although the total number of disks in the RAID 50 logical drive
is limited by the number of disks that can be attached to the two SCSI
channels. For example, if two Rack Storage/12 enclosures are used, the
maximum number of disks in a RAID 50 logical drive is 24.
RAID 50 gives good performance if you have a high volume of small, random
transfers.
RAID 50 Disadvantages
Capacity expansion is an offline operation only.
Performance is slower than RAID 0 or RAID 10.
RAID 50 Summary
Choose RAID 50 if you need a large logical drive size, and cost, availability,
and performance are equally important. RAID 50 performs best for I/O-
intensive, high read/write ratio applications such as transaction processing.
Table 2-1. RAID Level Summary for RAID Levels 0 to 5
RAID Level
RAID 0
RAID 1
RAID 5
Also Known As
striping
mirroring
striping with
distributed parity
Fault Tolerance
no
yes
yes
Redundancy Type
none
duplicate
parity
Hot Spare Option
no
yes
yes
Disks Required
one or more
two
three or more
Usable Capacity
greatest
least
intermediate
Capacity
Reduction
none
50%
capacity of one disk
Read Performance
fast (depends on
number of disks)
intermediate
fast
Random Write
Performance
fastest
intermediate
slow
Sequential Write
Performance
fastest
intermediate
slowest
Typical Usage
Rapid reads and
writes with no need
for fault tolerance
Mostly small
random writes with
fault tolerance
Mostly small,
random transfers
with fault tolerance